Interactive tools
Calculate, assess, and audit the workflow before you automate it.
Free calculators, readiness assessments, and migration estimators that run on your own assumptions. Every tool produces a usable result, shows its calculation, and is re-runnable against the same inputs later.
Deterministic
The calculation is shown, not hidden
Re-runnable
Same inputs produce a comparable second reading
No signup
Results are not gated behind a form
Introduction
These are directional instruments, and they say so.
Each tool takes your assumptions and applies a stated calculation. That makes the output useful for comparing options and for finding the weakest input — and unsuitable for quoting elsewhere as a measurement.
The value is usually not the headline number. It is the sensitivity: which single input moves the result most is the actionable finding, and it is often not the one people expected.
The second value is the argument the questions provoke. Two people filling in the same assessment rarely agree on the inputs first time, and that disagreement is worth more than the score it resolves into.
- Format
- Interactive calculators
- Output
- Score plus downloadable report
- Cost
- Free, no signup
- Confidence
- Directional, not measured
Why this exists
Estimates get made anyway — usually without a stated model.
Decisions about automation, migration, and readiness are made with numbers whether or not anyone writes the model down. The undocumented version is the same estimate with the assumptions hidden, which makes it impossible to challenge.
The common failure is a confident score built on recalled inputs. Someone estimates hours-per-week from memory, the calculation is sound, and the result inherits the error with none of the uncertainty visible.
These tools do not fix that, but they make it inspectable: the inputs are explicit, the calculation is shown, and the sensitivity is visible, so an assumption that is doing all the work is obvious rather than buried.
You're likely here because
- A business case is being built on recalled numbers
- Two teams estimate the same project very differently
- You need a defensible starting figure quickly
How to choose
Which tool answers your question.
If
You need a value estimate for an automation
Start with
The AI ROI calculatorIf
A CRM migration is being scoped
Start with
The CRM migration calculatorIf
Spreadsheets are straining and replacement is on the table
Start with
The spreadsheet replacement calculatorIf
You want a reproducible measurement rather than an estimate
How it works
From a score to a decision you can defend.
A score on its own settles nothing. This is the sequence that turns one into evidence.
Step 01
Gather real inputs
Pull each input from the system that actually holds it. An assessment built on recalled numbers reproduces the assumptions you already had.
Step 02
Score the current state
Run the tool to get a baseline, recording the inputs alongside the result so it can be re-run later against the same definitions.
Step 03
Find the binding constraint
Identify the single input contributing most of the gap. Improvement usually comes from one constraint rather than from moving every input a little.
Step 04
Change one thing
Address that constraint as a bounded change with a named owner and a completion condition.
Step 05
Re-score and compare
Re-run with the same input definitions. A comparable second reading is what turns the score from an opinion into evidence.
Available tools
Every assessment and calculator — 10 in total.
calculator
AI ROI Calculator
Model annual value from hours recovered, loaded labor cost, conversion improvement, and implementation cost using your own assumptions.
Open tool →
calculator
CRM Migration Calculator
Score CRM migration complexity from record volume, custom fields, integrations, workflows, and data quality.
Open tool →
calculator
Spreadsheet Replacement Calculator
Estimate replacement pressure from users, manual updates, errors, handoffs, and business criticality.
Open tool →
assessment
Sales Automation Assessment
Assess prospecting, reply handling, scheduling, CRM hygiene, measurement, and controls.
Open tool →
assessment
Website Growth Audit
Audit conversion clarity, proof, speed, measurement, follow-up, and handoff quality.
Open tool →
assessment
AI Readiness Assessment
Assess trusted context, workflow clarity, integrations, measurement, and governance.
Open tool →
assessment
AI Operating System Scorecard
Score how well context, tools, workflows, people, models, and controls operate as one system.
Open tool →
selector
Connector Selection Tool
Score connection readiness before adding integrations for their own sake.
Open tool →
assessment
Launch Readiness Audit
Assess requirements, data, workflow state, ownership, validation, and rollout readiness.
Open tool →
assessment
Grow Readiness Audit
Assess ICP clarity, source data, outreach, reply handling, scheduling, pipeline, attribution, and controls.
Open tool →
Scope
What these tools are not.
- They are not measurements, and a result should not be quoted as one.
- They do not benchmark you against other companies.
- They cannot compensate for inputs that were estimated rather than retrieved.
- They do not account for second-order effects, which are often where real value sits.
FAQ
Questions about this collection.
Are the results accurate?
They are exactly as accurate as the inputs. The calculation is deterministic and shown; the uncertainty lives entirely in the assumptions you supply, which is why the sensitivity view matters more than the total.
Do I have to give an email address?
No. Results are shown immediately and the report downloads without a form.
Can I share the result?
Yes, and the inputs travel in the URL so the recipient sees the same scenario rather than a bare number.
How is this different from a benchmark framework?
A tool gives you a directional estimate in minutes from your assumptions. A benchmark framework gives you a reproducible measurement from your systems, and takes considerably longer.
Should I use this to justify a budget?
As a starting figure, yes — with the inputs attached. As a standalone number, no. Validate the two or three inputs driving most of the result against real system data first.
What if my situation does not fit the model?
Then the tool is the wrong instrument, and forcing it produces a confident irrelevant answer. Describing the situation to ARIA is usually a faster route to the right question.
Keep exploring
Related paths.
Start with ARIA
Ask ARIA about tools.
You do not have to pick your way through this collection to get started. Describe the outcome you want and ARIA determines which capabilities, systems, and workflows the job needs.
- ARIA acts only through the systems and permissions you connect.
- Connections use scoped credentials you can change or revoke.
- Actions are recorded, and consequential ones can require approval.
Start here
A score tells you where the gap is.
ARIA can take the same inputs, resolve which systems are involved, and route the work into the path that closes the gap — rather than leaving you with a number and a decision.